(A) Scope of Rule. Except as provided in this rule, all papers filed with the commission and all proceedings before it are confidential in nature and are absolutely privileged from disclosure by the commission or its staff, including former members and employees, in any other matter, including but not limited to civil, criminal, legislative, or administrative proceedings. All the commission’s investigative files and commission-generated documents are likewise confidential and privileged from disclosure. Nothing in this rule prohibits the respondent judge from making statements regarding the judge’s conduct.
(B) Before Filing a Formal Complaint.
(1) Before a complaint is filed, neither a commissioner nor a member of the commission staff may disclose the existence or contents of an investigation, testimony taken, or papers filed in it, except as needed for investigative purposes.
(2) The commission may at any time make public statements as to matters pending before it on its determination by a majority vote that it is in the public interest to do so, limited to statements
(a) that there is an investigation pending,
(b) that the investigation is complete and there is insufficient evidence for the commission to file a complaint, or
(c) with the consent of the respondent, that the investigation is complete and some specified disciplinary action has been taken.
(C) Discretionary Waiver of Confidentiality or Privilege. The commission may waive the confidentiality or privilege protections if:
(1) the respondent waives, in writing, the right to confidentiality or privilege;
(2) the grievant waives, in writing, the right to confidentiality or privilege;
(3) the witness whose statement, testimony, or other evidentiary item will be disclosed waives, in writing, the right to confidentiality or privilege; and
(4) a majority of the commission determines that the public interest will be served by doing so.
(D) After Filing of Formal Complaint
(1) When the commission issues a complaint, the following shall not be confidential or privileged:
(a) the complaint and all subsequent pleadings filed with the commission or master, all stipulations entered, all findings of fact made by the master or commission, and all reports of the master or commission; however, all papers filed with and proceedings before the commission during the period preceding the issuance of a complaint remain confidential and privileged except where offered into evidence in a formal hearing; and
(b) the formal hearing before the master or commission, and the public hearing provided for in MCR 9.216.
(2) This subrule neither limits nor expands a respondent’s right to discovery under MCR 9.208(C).
(3) The confidentiality or privilege of any otherwise nonpublic disciplinary action is waived in any proceeding on a concurrent or subsequent formal complaint.
(E) Disclosure to Grievant.
(1) Upon completion of an investigation or proceeding on a complaint, the commission shall disclose to the grievant that the commission
(a) has found no basis for action against the judge or determined not to proceed further in the matter,
(b) has taken an appropriate corrective action, the nature of which shall not be disclosed, or
(c) has recommended that the respondent be publicly censured, suspended, removed, or retired from office.
(F) Public Safety Exception. When the commission receives information concerning a threat to the safety of any person or persons, information concerning such person may be provided to the person threatened, to persons or organizations responsible for the safety of the person threatened, and to law enforcement or any appropriate prosecutorial agency.
(G) Disclosure to State Court Administrator.
(1) The commission may refer to the state court administrator requests for investigation and other communications received by the commission concerning the conduct of a judge if, in the opinion of the commission, the communications are properly within the scope of the duties of the administrator. The commission may provide the administrator with files, records, investigations, and reports of the commission relating to the matter. Such a referral does not preclude action by the commission if the judge’s conduct is of such a nature as to constitute grounds for action by the commission, or cannot be adequately resolved or corrected by action of the administrator.
(2) The commission may disclose to the administrator, upon request, the substance of files and records of the commission concerning a former judge who has been or may be assigned judicial duties by the administrator; a copy of the information disclosed must be furnished to the judge.
(H) Disclosure to Attorney Grievance Commission. Notwithstanding the prohibition against disclosure in this rule, the commission shall disclose information concerning a judge’s misconduct in office, mental or physical disability, or some other ground that warrants commission action under Const 1963, art 6, § 30, to the Attorney Grievance Commission, upon request. Absent a request, the commission may make such disclosure to the Attorney Grievance Commission. In the event of a dispute concerning the release of information, either the Attorney Grievance Commission or the Judicial Tenure Commission may petition the Supreme Court for an order resolving the dispute.
(I) Disclosure to Chief Judge. Notwithstanding the prohibition against disclosure in this rule, and except for those situations that involve a dismissal with explanation, the commission shall notify the chief judge of a court when the commission has taken action under MCR 9.207(B)(2)-(5) involving a magistrate or referee of that court. Upon the chief judge’s request, the referee or magistrate shall provide the chief judge with a copy of the commission’s written notice of disposition.